Study on effectiveness of BSE: Says they are not helpful

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> ]

Veteran Member

Date Joined Jul 2003
Total Posts : 2272
   Posted 7/16/2008 8:50 AM (GMT -6)   
Anyone else see this article? Sort of a devil's advocate to breast self exams. What do you think of this? Common sense says they are crucial to early detection, but there are some interesting points in this article...

Veteran Member

Date Joined Jul 2003
Total Posts : 1564
   Posted 7/17/2008 3:42 AM (GMT -6)   
Were it not for finding a lump myself, I probably wouldn't be alive today. Two invasive tumors were found as a result of BSE, and both were missed by mammogram. On the flip side, I have had one benign biopsy. A small scar is a miniscule price to pay for being sure.

I would like to know what the ages of the women were. I would guess that most women under the age of 40 find BRCA through BSE.

An interesting study, though.

Thanks for sharing!

"There's a difference between a philosophy and a bumper sticker."  --Charles Schulz

Veteran Member

Date Joined Jul 2003
Total Posts : 2044
   Posted 7/17/2008 2:16 PM (GMT -6)   
I know that a BSE found my cancerous lump at 6 mm, pretty tiny. A benign biopsy is a small price to pay for knowing something is not cancer, IMHO. But, I know all those biopsies are a cost for the insurance companies. Makes me wonder who is behind the study. Will have to read the article more carefully. As far as I am concerned, BSEs is one more step in being proactive about our own health. What's wrong with that? Lauri
Dxed 04/11/1996
"Go confidently into the direction of your dreams. Live the life you always imagined" Thoreau
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away.

Veteran Member

Date Joined Jul 2003
Total Posts : 2272
   Posted 7/17/2008 3:54 PM (GMT -6)   
I agree ladies....mine was found incidentally. Had it not been found by me, I am sure it would be advanced when discovered. I was not doing mammograms then due to age, so surely I'd be a goner too. And had I not been proactive with my health, I'd be sitting here with a malignant tumor on my thyroid, none the wiser.

I can't say I agree with the article, but did find it food for thought.

Regular Member

Date Joined Jun 2005
Total Posts : 349
   Posted 7/17/2008 5:37 PM (GMT -6)   
I did not read the article, but saw a headline on a web page. For me, BSEs' are crucial for women. It might not catch it early-early, but it will certainly catch tumors. First one I had was benign when I was 26, just accidentally found it while bathing. My second and positive one could have been found much earlier if I had just done them! I might have not required so much treatment!

Veteran Member

Date Joined Jul 2005
Total Posts : 688
   Posted 7/17/2008 8:29 PM (GMT -6)   

I saw this article on Good Morning America today and I felt like the rest of you that BSE are a life saver. From my experience most women do not do their mamograms like they should and BSE will get them to do it earlier. I think another thing that would help women is just plain old more info on breast cancer. I have to admit I did not know very much about the disease until I had it. I wonder why they would publish something like this, so many women dont do BSE as it is and now even less will because they will think it is not necessary.

Hugs, Bernadette

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
Forum Information
Currently it is Thursday, October 27, 2016 11:31 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 2,713,250 posts in 299,173 threads.
View Active Threads

Who's Online
This forum has 153749 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, situatnsl1i.
257 Guest(s), 9 Registered Member(s) are currently online.  Details
THE HAPPY TURTLE, hypoHashimoto, abhi, FW, orchid_rain, Girlie, supapfunk, couchtater, quincy

Follow on Facebook  Follow on Twitter  Follow on Pinterest

©1996-2016 LLC  All rights reserved.

Advertise | Privacy Policy & Disclaimer