I ain't no Canuck, but, based on a quick looksee -
My immediate thought is, there is a heck of a lot of people doing research on HTLV 1 - 3, (the AIDS virus and co) and if they are reporting all they are about
gene expression, genotype etc, then that is one truly enormous conspiracy scattered worldwide amongst many different organisations with employees of all different sorts of political flavour. Not to mention the Scanning Electron Micrographs (photos) of the virus itself, the tests which have a proven predictive ability, the treatment protocols... and the fact that it first got noticed in Haitian prostitutes.
Much of what if there I have no prior bckground knowledge of, so cannot vouch for its veracity. Some of the historic data is undoubtedly true - yes, the research into brucellosis did occur (some in Scotland, which is why I know about
it) and probably yes, the toxin would be crystalline in nature when refined and its structure analysed - although Xray crystallography did not take off until the late 50s, when Watson and Crick used it.
It strikes me that this is a hodge podge of truths, possible truths, and supposition, perhaps with many pertinent facts left out that define the latter. Tin foil hat brigade ?
Well, I'm a mean Scot...I'm an Aberdonian...but even if it was free, I certainly wouldn't rely on this guy's science to cure me.
Go on, let loose the flying monkeys Broomhilde !