I went docs a couple months back and bloods were normal. Calprotectin was 317 so was sent for the camera procedure. Doc took biopsies and gave me a copy of the letter with pictures. Said on first look it looks like UC but upon further inspection looks like crohns. Ulcers present and red.
Said consultant is now away on annual leave and my own GP rang today - biopsies are normal but she can't get access to any other information. I asked if this means I don't have IBD and she said no, she really doesn't know. I have to wait until consultant is back and gives me an appointment (could take weeks).
Anyone else with similar experience? Anyone else had negative biopsies but still diagnosed?
Post Edited (cookiecrumble) : 9/15/2017 6:53:37 AM (GMT-6)