Hi Guys... Thanks for the replies
Lanie... actually, it was the first number (systolic) that was 83. That's why she was so concerned. It all went so fast that I didn't have a chance to write down the other number (diastolic) but it was low, too.
I've always had normal-low blood pressure but this time it was really low. I see my GP in a couple weeks so, I'm going to ask her to check it again (maybe do the standing/sitting/laying down thing).
- Phishbowl (Type 1 since Jan'05 - Levemir, NovoRapid)
"What's Not Measured Is Not Managed"
"It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows"-Epictetus