23 years old, found lump, curious about Dr.'s opinion.....

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> ]

dace
New Member


Date Joined Oct 2004
Total Posts : 1
   Posted 10/27/2004 9:24 PM (GMT -7)   
I am twenty-three years old, found a lump in the upper right quadrant of my right breast slightly lateral to the nipple. Saw the doctor today and he is very hopeful that it isn't cancer, but two of my family members have had it and died. He called for a sonogram, and after reading a little bit more about this procedure I am curious as to the accuracy of "false-positives". Please respond with any help.... Thanks....
It is all the young can do for the old, to shock them and keep them up to date."  -George Bernard Shaw

Post Edited (dace) : 10/27/2004 10:37:35 PM (GMT-6)


Tavish
Veteran Member


Date Joined Jul 2003
Total Posts : 2272
   Posted 10/28/2004 3:44 AM (GMT -7)   
A false negative would be much more devastating...to tell you it is nothing when it is something. Odds are quite high in your favor for it to be nothing. Lumpy breasts are common in women your age, and in general, 80% of lumps are benign. Only 5% of BC is inherited, so "running in your family" may or may not have an impact. How old were the women who had it and what relation are they to you?

As for a "false positive"...I would not worry. In my case, at age 30, the ultrasound was definitive, whereas the mammogram showed nothing. If the u/s looks like anything, they will biopsy it to be sure. In fact, you might ask about biopsy anyway...while the u/s is good, nothing is sure till you examine the cells.

Good for you for seeing your doctor! And don't let them turn you away just because you are "too young".

Good luck.
Lori


gma
Veteran Member


Date Joined Jul 2003
Total Posts : 2921
   Posted 10/28/2004 6:45 AM (GMT -7)   
I sure cannot do any better than Lori answering your question. I had a benign lump at age 27, another at age 42, and was daignosed with very early breast cancer at age 8. Each time my lump was removed for diagnosis. It has now been eight years since my mastectomy and I am NED (No evidence of disease). I hope and pray that you will get a lumpectomy or biopsy and and be able to say it is B-9, too. But you need to have a pathological analysis to be sure. I will emphasize again Lori's last line, do not let them tell you "you are too young to have breast cancer". Be sure. Hugs MK


Candy
Veteran Member


Date Joined Jul 2003
Total Posts : 1294
   Posted 10/28/2004 7:33 AM (GMT -7)   
Dace:

Please listen to and follow all of the above advise. U/S is a good first step and getting answers. See how I said first step? Biopsy is really the only true way to know for sure. Let us know how how you are doing. Continue to research, knowledge is power.

Hugs,
Candy
"A sister filled with joy preaches without preaching.  Joy is a need and a power for us . . . for it makes us always ready to go about doing good." 
                              Mother Teresa
 

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
Forum Information
Currently it is Friday, November 17, 2017 10:48 AM (GMT -7)
There are a total of 2,894,768 posts in 317,727 threads.
View Active Threads


Who's Online
This forum has 157338 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, blinkyk.
410 Guest(s), 15 Registered Member(s) are currently online.  Details
Crispix, Notam, island time, Pirouette, mtm3461, Wotan, Pratoman, PA_grandma, ChickenArise, Alex26, PNWBoarder, TheYeti, straydog, blinkyk, iPoop


About Us | Advertise | Donate
Newsletter | Privacy Policy & Disclaimer
Follow HealingWell.com on Facebook Follow HealingWell.com on Twitter Follow HealingWell.com on Pinterest
©1996-2017 HealingWell.com LLC  All Rights Reserved.