The Dude Abides said...
The point being this: If the vaccine had been given just five minutes earlier, the Mother would have been absolutely convinced the vaccine caused the seizure. Proving causation versus correlation is tricky.
This argument would be valid if that child who had a seizure just 5 min before taking the vaccine was the ONLY and SOLE child in a given context or place. But THAT IS NOT THE CASE. We are speaking about
deaths happening to SEVERAL elderly people DYING shortly just after being given the vaccine, ALL IN THE SAME PLACE they are being cared off. The same applies to several people having the same adverse reaction in the same place they go, where they have that same vaccine.
I saw that argument many times and it definetly doesnt fit, because it uses a single isolated case. If the same child had a seizure just before the vaccine, what about
if there were 10 childrens in the same place, one has a seizure before the vaccine, people would use the same argument: "you see? This is why people get afraid from vaccines, because bad coincidences happen..", but the person who uses this argument, soon shuts his mouth up, after realizing that 6 other children, in the same place, gets a seizure JUST SHORTLY AFTER THE VACCINE. It happens the fact that a single child had a seizure before the vaccine, was a coincidence itself, but that coincidence does NOT NEVER EVER be an explanation or excuse that it was the seizure was casual or unexpected, since more 6 children had a seizure after the vaccine.
That is what happened to several elderly in the same nursing homes after the shoots and WITHOUT COVID. This only means that a specific group of people, who are at the risk of dying after the vaccine, are being ignored , underestimated and being denied the right, the human right, for more research about
why this happens to them, in part because of arguments like the ones you present and wish doesnt apply in the examples i mentioned.
The poor argument is only a way of throwing sand to the eyes..
The rule is, nothing happens without a cause, but every cause can be ignored and "experts" use every single detail to ignore a cause and dismiss it. I usually dont buy this
Take and dont be so sure about
what the "experts" say to you. Use common sense and be critic and assertive like they are of the negative adverse events but on the opposite side, if you have reasons for it and as i showed, you have
Post Edited (isitlyme) : 2/22/2021 2:19:35 AM (GMT-7)