Really bad path. report, need others input to options (Was No Subject)

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> ]

Oncas
Regular Member


Date Joined Jan 2009
Total Posts : 390
   Posted 4/4/2009 11:15 AM (GMT -6)   
Still a bit clumsy at navigating threads and proper posting on this forum so forgive me if i am repetitious.
Finally got a call from my urologist last night concerning the frightening path reports from my RRP on 3/26. As I suggested in an earlier post, everything was much worse than expected. A Gleason 9 tumor consuming 80% of gland. Positive margins, positive sem vesicles and unfortunately 2 of 9 nodes positive. He feels that the best option is to wait until there is a significant rise in PSA and begin hormonal therapy. He felt that given my stats this was only realistic course of action. I trust his opinion but I was disappointed that his path of attack was so narrow. Obviously my disease is seriously advanced but as I understand the protocol, hormonal approaches usually only hold up for a year or two before the cancer regroups and mounts another advance. My intention is to seek the advice of an oncologist in the interim, but the wait and see approach at this juncture makes me really uncomfortable. Does a node positive pathology always contraindicate any local treatment? Will chemo be the only option after hormonal? Yeah I know ... these are questions for my dr. but we all throw them out there anyway. Best to all my brothers in the trenches

Oncas (Jim)

Added a Subject for archiving purposes

Post Edited By Moderator (James C.) : 4/10/2009 5:53:07 PM (GMT-6)


Tony Crispino
Veteran Member


Date Joined Dec 2006
Total Posts : 8128
   Posted 4/4/2009 1:04 PM (GMT -6)   
Jim,
I can't recommend enough that it is time for a medical oncologist who has a strong PCa background. In addition, a radiologist might be in a difference of opinion with your urologist. Your diagnosis warrants being proactive and leaving no stone unturned. Node involvement means usually that there will be no local cure, but there is still benefit to treating involved nodes with radiation. Even if a radiologist won't proceed on his judgement, there always one opinion that matters most. You are you own advocate and make all the calls. If you want to start HT and radiate, it's not your urologists call, it's yours. But don't do anything you don't understand what you are getting into with. QoL (quality of life) is the name of the game. Each step has side effects, but I have done well with them.

If HT fails, there are many things in reserve. But you really need that medical oncologist that specializes in systemic treatments. He should be well versed in when to act, and also every on every available clinical trial. I have taken these steps and it isn't too daunting at all.

Jim, I don't recall where you are. I am certain we can tell you where you can narrow your search to.

Tony
Age 46 (44 when Dx)
Pre-op PSA was 19.8 : Surgery at The City of Hope on February 16, 2007
Geason 4+3=7, Stage pT3b, N0, Mx
Positive Margins (PM), Extra Prostatic Extension (EPE) : Bilateral Seminal vesicle invasion (SVI)
HT began in May, '07 with Lupron and Casodex 50mg (2 Year ADT)
IMRT radiation for 38 Treatments ending August 3, '07
Current PSA (January 13, 2009): <0.1
 
My Journal is at Tony's Blog  
 
STAY POSITIVE!


Swimom
Veteran Member


Date Joined Apr 2006
Total Posts : 1732
   Posted 4/4/2009 2:28 PM (GMT -6)   
If waiting it out as your Doctor has suggested is what you end up doing Jim, maybe adding modified citrus pectin? Just a thought. It was the very first thing my general physician suggested. He knows I feel better doing anything rather than just waiting. Once I decide to get going that is...I prefer to be the ostrich.

Goog Luck,
Paul
 


sandstorm
Regular Member


Date Joined Dec 2008
Total Posts : 194
   Posted 4/4/2009 4:58 PM (GMT -6)   
Gosh Jim I'm not even in the same league with OhioState and TC-LasVegas, but I can agree with them and offer my best wishes to your success in beating this vile demon we all deal with.
Age at DX 57
5-18-07 PSA 7.7
5-06-08 PSA 4.6  8% free psa, but stable
10-23-08 PSA 5.65 4% free psa
11-04-08 biopsy
11-11-08 2 of 12 cores positive
Gleason 3+3  6  stage t1c / post-op 3+4  7  stage t2c
CT and Bone scan negative
Da Vinci RRP 01-09-09
Catheter removed 1-15-09
Pathology Report says it's gone!
First Post-op PSA 2-17-09   0.00


stxdave
Regular Member


Date Joined Nov 2008
Total Posts : 65
   Posted 4/4/2009 9:31 PM (GMT -6)   
Hi Jim,
Sorry your post-surgical statististics were not more promising but that's not the end of the story by a long shot. Keep in mind you debulked a lot of cancer by removing your prostate. I am glad to hear you are engaging a medical oncologist for a second opinion. I went to a medical oncologist in 2001 and manipulated hormones from then 'til now, so that's more than a couple of years. I wish you the best.

Dave
Dx'd 1999, Age 60, PSA 43, Gleason (3+4=7), T3c
42-3d EBRT w/Lupron/Casodex for 24 months and PSA remaining to be <0.1 for the entire 24 month period.
July 2001 - 2nd opinion required to go intermittent ADT.
MDAnderson biopsy revised Gleason (4+5=9).
Intermittent ADT, Lupron only, with PSA threshhold established at 1.0.
March 2007 - Diminishing returns with Lupron, conferred with MDA urologist for bilateral orchiectomy. Uro asked for biopsy of prostate again. Biopsy resulted in tumors found with Gleason (5+4=9).
August 2007 - RRP and bilateral orchiectomy. PSA <0.1
99% continent immediately
September 2008 - PSA 0.45
November 2008 - PSA 0.67
December 2008 - Resume Casodex
December 2008 - Stricture in bladder neck requiring surgical removal. 99% incontinent immediately.


Life is not waiting for the storm to pass, it's learning to dance in the rain.

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
Forum Information
Currently it is Sunday, September 23, 2018 7:09 AM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 3,005,817 posts in 329,266 threads.
View Active Threads


Who's Online
This forum has 161807 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, Wimp7755.
233 Guest(s), 6 Registered Member(s) are currently online.  Details
Wimp7755, trailguy, zack36, Redwing57, franko63, iPoop