Open vs Laproscopic Surgery -- a new report

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> ]

geezer99
Veteran Member


Date Joined Apr 2009
Total Posts : 990
   Posted 10/14/2009 10:43 AM (GMT -6)   
Here is a link to a New York Times report of a new study out of Harvard comparing the results of open surgery with laproscopic (includes robotic)
www.nytimes.com/2009/10/14/health/research/14prostate.html?_r=1&ref=health

The good news is that both seem equally effective against cancer. The bad news is that laproscopic seems to have greater side effects of incontinence and ED.

This study is controversial because it does not take the surgeon's experience into account.

{edit by Geezer}
I just noticed that the thread
Article about Robotic Prostate cancer surgery
is about this same study
Age at diagnosis 66, PSA 5.5
Biopsy 12/08 12 cores, 8 positive
Gleason 3+4=7
CAT scan, Bone scan 1/09 both negative.

Robotic surgery 03/03/09 Catheter Out 03/08/09
Pathology: Lymph nodes & Seminal vesicles negative
Margins positive, Capsular penetration extensive Gleason 4+3=7
6 weeks: 1 pad/day, 1 pad/night -- mostly dry at night.
10 weeks: no pad at night -- slight leakage day/1 pad.
3 mo. PSA 0.0 - now light pads

Post Edited (geezer99) : 10/14/2009 10:58:10 AM (GMT-6)

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, June 25, 2018 12:24 AM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 2,974,897 posts in 326,220 threads.
View Active Threads


Who's Online
This forum has 161311 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, cannhub.
273 Guest(s), 1 Registered Member(s) are currently online.  Details
BOB 46