Viagra Hearing Loss Confirmed

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> ]

Steve n Dallas
Veteran Member


Date Joined Mar 2008
Total Posts : 4849
   Posted 5/20/2010 10:41 AM (GMT -6)   
Viagra hearing loss is confirmed. The Viagra study reveals hearing impairment or loss when men take the erectile dysfunction drug. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has known about the side effect and has issued warnings since 2007. -snip-

Dr. Saunders doesn't recommend the drug to anyone who already has been diagnosed with ear problems.

 


Galileo
Veteran Member


Date Joined Nov 2008
Total Posts : 697
   Posted 5/20/2010 10:54 AM (GMT -6)   
Could you please speak up? I can't understand it when people mumble.
Galileo

Dx Feb 2006, PSA 9 @age 43
RRP Apr 2006 - Gleason 3+4, T2c, NX MX, pos margins
PSA 5/06 <0.1, 8/06 0.2, 12/06 0.6, 1/07 0.7.
Salvage radiation (IMRT) total dose 70.2 Gy, Jan-Mar 2007@ age 44
PSA 6/07 0.1, 9/07 and thereafter <0.1
http://pcabefore50.blogspot.com


rob2
Veteran Member


Date Joined Apr 2008
Total Posts : 1132
   Posted 5/20/2010 12:23 PM (GMT -6)   
Humm... Erection or hearing loss, which one do I want. Interesting article. Viagra does not work well for me (Cialis works slightly better). My side effort is sensitivity to the light after taking a pill.
 
Age 48 at diagnosis
occupation accountant
PSA increased from 2.6 to 3.5 in one year
biopsy march 2008 - cancer present gleason 7
Robotic Surgery May 9, 2008 - houston, tx
Pathology report -gleason 8, clear margins
22 month  PSA <.04
continent at 10 weeks (no pads!)
ED is still an issue


Jstars
Regular Member


Date Joined Oct 2005
Total Posts : 489
   Posted 5/20/2010 4:08 PM (GMT -6)   
I always thought the REAL hearing loss with viagra was because of your partner's legs pinning your head and ears ... or other chesty stuff (family lingo) blocking your ears ....

That's what always happens to me -- can't hear a thing!
Age 59, 57 at DX, PSA Aug2008 7 4 ... June2007 4.7 (BPH + LUTS)
11/2008 Biopsy: 1 of 12 cores 5%, Gleason 3+3 - Sona showed size 140+ cc (110 grams post op).
02/03/09 open RRP surgery ,Nerve sparing, 1 day in hospital.
02/18/09 Cath out -- passed 1 cm oblong bladder stone (not kidney!).
Pathology Report: All margins clear - No Invasive spread - no change in Gleason score.
04/09, 07/09, 10/09, 01/15/10 PSA <0.1
03/2009 Levitra@20mg / Viagra@100mg/Cialis@20mg -- (nocturnal stirrings started 02-03/2010).
08/09-09/09,02-03/10 MUSE@1000mcg 80-90% (with some ache )
10/09-11/09 TrimixGel@(500/300/100mcg): 60,70,80%,
02/10-03/10 TrimixGel@1000/300/100mcg - 80-90% - just @ usefulness.
Gel + MUSE 500mcg -- 100% for 30-60 mins and 80-90% for hours after that).


TheOldFart
Regular Member


Date Joined Mar 2010
Total Posts : 34
   Posted 5/20/2010 5:34 PM (GMT -6)   
Quote from the article: "The side effect can occur when men take high doses of the drug."

I have searched for more information, but could not find much more than in this article. Has anyone seen what is meant by "high doses"? Is that 50 mg and 100 mg or just 100 mg or is it for people who try to take more than 100 mg? As normal with news articles, they just state the high impact headline and not enough info to really know the dangers. Was twice the risk 1000 vs. 500 of the 10,000 plus men or was it 4 vs. 2? My guess is it is much closer to the 4 vs. 2.

Postop
Regular Member


Date Joined Feb 2010
Total Posts : 385
   Posted 5/20/2010 6:35 PM (GMT -6)   
My question is, a lot of the people who take these medications have conditions like diabetes and artery disease. Are men with erectile dysfunction more likely to have hearing loss anyway? That is, an association between hearing loss and Viagra use doesn't mean that Viagra causes the hearing loss. However, the fact that they didn't see an association with Cialis or Levitra is concerning.



This is the article:

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 May;136(5):488-92.
Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use and hearing impairment.

McGwin G Jr.

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. mcgwin@uab.edu
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) between participants with and without self-reported hearing impairment using logistic regression, with and without adjustment for potentially confounding sociodemographic, behavioral, and health-related characteristics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: United States. PATIENTS: A population-based sample of 11 525 men 40 years or older (248,217,013 weighted men) in the United States, selected from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2003-2006). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported hearing impairment. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of self-reported hearing impairment and PDE-5i use in each group was 17.9% and 2%, respectively. Men who reported hearing impairment were more likely to have also reported the use of any PDE-5i (odds ratio [OR], 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-3.66). However, this association was limited to sildenafil (Viagra) (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.23-3.43); no significant associations were observed for tadalafil (Cialis) or vardenafil (Levitra) (ORs, 1.40 [95% CI, 0.49-4.04] and 0.88 [95% CI, 0.35-2.22], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Current warnings regarding the risk of hearing loss related to PDE-5i use seems to be justified. However, the cross-sectional nature of the current study provides only limited insight regarding this relationship, and thus additional research is warranted.

jacketch
Regular Member


Date Joined Apr 2009
Total Posts : 179
   Posted 5/20/2010 7:12 PM (GMT -6)   
Gives new meaning to "hard of hearing"
63 yo
V10.46 Dx Feb-09

RRP 5-5-09

No adverse SE

PSA 6-19-09  -0-

PSA 9-21-09  -0-

1 year PSA 5-3-10  -0-



Thriving, not just surviving!


Worried Guy
Veteran Member


Date Joined Jul 2009
Total Posts : 3743
   Posted 5/20/2010 8:03 PM (GMT -6)   
Jacketch, You nailed it! :-)

I'll have to try that. Maybe the quiet will help me sleep. I don't get any other benefit from it.


(By the way, I've got the audio test equipment if anyone wants to run an experiment or two.)

kcragman
Regular Member


Date Joined May 2008
Total Posts : 240
   Posted 5/20/2010 8:28 PM (GMT -6)   
Wow. That's something. I only know that Viagra works better for me than Cialis - but I have NO side effects with Cialis. With Viagra, I have to eat something first, and then within a hour or so we HAVE to get busy. A couple weeks ago I took a Viagra on an empty stomach, and we did NOT get busy - at all (we were interrupted), and I had the worse headache and felt generally crappy for rest of that day and all the next.

My wife kept telling me to take another pill. Good thing I couldn't hear her. (ha-ha)

kcragman
Age: 53; 52 at DX
March 2006: PSA 2.5
Dec 2007: PSA taken for insurance application. I did not see the results until late
Jan '08 - after I was rejected. Their lab said PSA 4.5.
Feb 2008: PSA 3.7.
March 2008: Biopsy. Gleason 7 (4+3) 12 cores taken. 5 on the left side were
cancerous and the 6th was suspect.
May 5, 2008: Da Vinci robotic laparoscopy at GW Hospital, Washington DC. Doctor: Jason Engel

Post op: Gleason 9 (4+5). 15% of prostate involved. Stage: pT3a. Negative margins. Lymph node and nerve samples taken, and appeared to be cancer free.

July 2008 - Nov 2009: PSA testing. Undetectable thru 18 months.

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, September 24, 2018 8:21 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 3,006,272 posts in 329,320 threads.
View Active Threads


Who's Online
This forum has 161825 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, TheRayf.
328 Guest(s), 9 Registered Member(s) are currently online.  Details
Froggy88, sebreg, Admin, John T, 142, Cashed Out, halbert, dsrouillard, Lanie G