I am doubtful that labs would round down for results, but I am not a lab expert. I would rather think they would post it as less than the next highest point, as in <.1 or <.2.
I am an advocate of ultrasensitive as an aid in following PSA progression. I am a little suspicious of the .2, as not being of the same assay type. Worried Guy has posted some interesting threads on the wide differences in PSA testing techniques.
The bad news, which apparently is not new news to you, is that you will require step 2. I wish you well during your SRT, and will watch for progress reports.
May you find the little suckers sleeping in the bed.
Age 58, PSA 4.47 Biopsy - 2/12 cores , Gleason 4 + 5 = 9
Da Vinci, Cleveland Clinic 4/14/09 Nerves spared, but carved up a little.
0/23 lymph nodes involved pT3a NO MX
Catheter and 2 stints in ureters for 2 weeks .
Neg Margins, bladder neck negative
Living the Good Life, cancer free 6 week PSA <.03
3 month PSA <.01 (different lab)
5 month PSA <.03 (undetectable)
6 Month PSA <.01
1 pad a day, no progress on ED. Trimix injection
No pads, 1/1/10, 9 month PSA < .01
1 year psa (364 days) .01
15 month PSA <.01