Radiation Treatment Discussion

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> ]

Newporter
Regular Member


Date Joined Sep 2010
Total Posts : 225
   Posted 4/4/2011 11:55 AM (GMT -6)   
A point for discussion: Regarding radiation risk and effect on our body. I saw in a number of threads where folks cautioned against CT and bone scan for they could increase cancer risk. I think some analysis and discussion maybe helpful.

1. Radiation Oncologist measures radiation in Gy. Most treatment now uses 70 Gy.

2. EPA measures radiation risk in Si (Sievert). Mostly limits exposure to < 20 mSi (1/1000 Si) per year. That is the limit for nuclear reactor workers.

Gy is radiation dose and Si is radiation dose absorbed by a human.

1 GY is roughly equal 1 Si (very approximate).

CT scan and bone scan are about 4 to 7 mSi each, well within the risk level of EPA. 70 Gy is a lot of radiation. No matter how sharp the radiation beam is there is spillover. If during treatment, 1% of the radiation spills over to the other organs, they would be getting 700 mSi, equivalent to taking 100 CT scan. If the spillover is minimized, then they may not be killing all the cancer cells. The damage to surrounding cells supposedly can be minimized, by splitting the radiation over 30 to 40 smaller doses. But they also argued that radiation is cumulative so splitting into smaller dose does not diminish the radiation treatment effectiveness? So, I do not know if splitting the radiation into smaller doses help reduce secondary cancer risk in the long term. Some medical books are saying radiation damage to cells is cumulative.

Therefore, I think, first, the risk of CT scan and bone scan are very small, and second, the radiation spillover during the treatment itself may be more of a risk. How much spillover vs insufficient coverage will depend on the equipment and the skill of the radiation oncologist.

In the Japanese reactor accident, I think they are talking about limiting exposure to rescuers at less than 1 Si, which is roughly equal to the spillover radiation in the above example.

Casey59
Veteran Member


Date Joined Sep 2009
Total Posts : 3172
   Posted 4/4/2011 12:03 PM (GMT -6)   
I sometimes listen to the "Doctor Radio" station on XM-radio in my car. Yesterday on the "Oncology Show" there was interesting discussion about radiation and about how the current events in Japan have "clouded" the general understanding of all types of radiation. Anyone else listen to this show...?
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, June 18, 2018 9:23 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 2,973,066 posts in 326,056 threads.
View Active Threads


Who's Online
This forum has 160877 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, aftonafton.
437 Guest(s), 7 Registered Member(s) are currently online.  Details
tarawa, Flying gal, Cowboy Jack, Momento, Broken0ne, NutMeg1987, Megan Eliz