Uro today abstract on Active surveillance

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> ]

daveshan
Regular Member


Date Joined Jan 2010
Total Posts : 363
   Posted 5/4/2011 4:27 PM (GMT -6)   
I get emails from Uro today, one caught my eye today and makes me rethink AS a bit. You have to sign up to see the text but I'll cut/paste the high points here.

Link for the guys who are/want to sign up


www.urotoday.com/index.php?option=com_jentlacontent&view=enhanced&id=LkU6QkVIWS5GVk4zQ1AtOypYLkBgCmAK&Itemid=57


Most of the abstract for those who just want the meat.

The data of patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy at our institution between 1998 and 2010 were reviewed. We only included the patients that met the usual criteria for active surveillance: clinical stage T1-2a tumor, PSA ≤ 10ng/mL, biopsy Gleason sum inferior or equal to 6 with no pattern of grade 4 or 5, cancer involvement inferior or equal to two biopsy cores, inferior to 3mm of malignant tissue in each positive biopsy core. From them, only those who were diagnosed from a second line biopsies cores were included for further analysis.

Overall, 48 patient who met the "SURACAP" criteria had a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at out institution. Mean age was 65.4 years. The mean preoperative PSA was 6.1ng/mL. Clinical stage of the tumor was T1c in 95% of patients and T2a in 5%. Biopsy Gleason score was 6(3+3) in 100%. Pathological analysis of the surgical specimen showed that 19% of patients had a seminal vesicle invasion or an extracapsular extension. The Gleason score of the pathological specimen was 6 (3 +3) in 57% of patients, 7 (3 +4) in 38% and 8 (4 +4) in 5% of patients. The Gleason score upgrading was 43% of patients.

In our experience, 19% of patients who meet the criteria for active surveillance show an extracapsular extension or a seminal vesicle invasion on pathological analysis. Active surveillance is still under evaluation.


I never was even close to AS but for someone thinking of it, WOW.
Dave in Durango CO

07-06 PSA 2.5
01-08 PSA 5.5 (Dr never told me)
09-09 PSA 6.5 (age 55)
12-09 Biopsy, initial Gleason 9 (4+5) later reduced to 8 with tertiary 5
03-01-10 Age 55 RRP in Durango CO by Dr Sejal Quale and Dr Shandra Wilson
03-16-10 Path' G-8 (4+4+5) Bilateral involving 21% of left lobe, 3% of right lobe, SVI, Focal positive margin, pT3b NO MX

All PSA as of 5-03-11 <0.04

F8
Veteran Member


Date Joined Feb 2010
Total Posts : 3800
   Posted 5/4/2011 5:47 PM (GMT -6)   
the number of guys who are upgraded here tells me that AS wouldn't work for me. 
 
ed
 
 
age: 56
PSA on 12/09: 6.8
gleason 3+4 = 7
HT, BT and IGRT
received 3rd and last lupron shot 9/14/10
2/8/11 PSA <.1, T= 6 ng/dl

Cajun Jeff
Veteran Member


Date Joined Mar 2009
Total Posts : 4106
   Posted 5/4/2011 5:57 PM (GMT -6)   
Some guys have been very successful with AS but you have to be willing to take the risk and have the guts for it. I was too big a chicken for that. Had to have it out.

Cajun jeff
9/08 PSA 5.4 referred to Urologist
9/08 Biopsy: GS 3+4=7 1 positive core in 12 1% cancer core
10/08 Nerve-Sparing open radicalSurgery Path Report Downgrade 3+3=6 GS Stage pT2c margins clea
r3 month: PSA <0.1
19th month: PSA <0.1
2 year PSA <0.1
Only issue at this time is ED but getting better
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
Forum Information
Currently it is Wednesday, June 20, 2018 3:24 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 2,973,777 posts in 326,128 threads.
View Active Threads


Who's Online
This forum has 161113 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, bbruneau.
467 Guest(s), 15 Registered Member(s) are currently online.  Details
SoMuchFun, carattop, mattamx, mysweetpanda, sandyfeet, Michael_T, LucyDog, Scaredy Cat, The Dude Abides, Girlie, Coral, mpost, blksteeda, OriolCarol, straydog