Trimix and climax

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> ]

reachout
Veteran Member


Date Joined May 2009
Total Posts : 739
   Posted 6/7/2011 7:43 AM (GMT -6)   
The trimix works pretty well for my ED, at 36 units, as far as the erection itself. However, I note that actually achieving a climax through penetration alone is nearly impossible. I don't have the best back, or stamina, so I give up after 10 minutes or so of trying. I'm wondering if this is commonplace with Trimix, or similar therapies, or if I'm just not using enough. My doc said I could go up to 40, but so far I've held back out of fear of having to go to the ER. On the other hand, I think my erection is only about 80%, so maybe I'm being too conservative.

Cajun Jeff
Veteran Member


Date Joined Mar 2009
Total Posts : 4123
   Posted 6/7/2011 8:49 AM (GMT -6)   
I think most of us that have used TriMix have found that at times (not always) Climax does not happen. I need to clarify this... Not even most of the time just occasional there is an issue with climax. Still fun trying to get there!

Cajun jeff
9/08 PSA 5.4 referred to Urologist
9/08 Biopsy: GS 3+4=7 1 positive core in 12 1% cancer core
10/08 Nerve-Sparing open radicalSurgery Path Report Downgrade 3+3=6 GS Stage pT2c margins clea
r3 month: PSA <0.1
19th month: PSA <0.1
2 year PSA <0.1
Only issue at this time is ED but getting better

mspt98
Regular Member


Date Joined Dec 2008
Total Posts : 377
   Posted 6/7/2011 3:42 PM (GMT -6)   
You might want to have your T level checked for low testosterone. I am having increased difficulty climaxing during sex even though the erections are fine with trimix. I'm convinced its from having low T, desire seems to be the issue with me

My age= 52 when this all happened.
DRE=negative,
PSA went from 1.9 to 2.85 in one year, biopsy ordered,
Second biopsy on 08/14/08 found 2/12 cores positive for CA on R side, 1 core=5%CA, other core=25% CA, Gleason score= 6 both cores,
Bilateral nerve sparing robotic surgery on 09/11/08, pathological stage T2A,
No signs of spread, organ confined,
6 0's in a row, still use trimix for ED

reachout
Veteran Member


Date Joined May 2009
Total Posts : 739
   Posted 6/7/2011 3:59 PM (GMT -6)   
Frankly, I also have desire issues but can achieve penetration with Trimix, just no climax. about the T, I'm not sure what could be done even if it was low. The thought of supplemental T scares the heck out of me thinking it may feed remaining cancer cells. What do you think?
Age: 66
PSA: bounced around from 2.6 to 5.6 over 2 years
Biopsy 8 of 12 +, G 3+4, T2a
DaVinci 9/09, path G 4+3, - M, NX, MX, T2c
Continent right away
ED pills did't work, Trimix works well
Post-surgery PSA:
12/09 <0.1
4/10 <0.014
6/10, 9/10, 12/10 <0.1
4/11 0.05
5/11 0.05

mspt98
Regular Member


Date Joined Dec 2008
Total Posts : 377
   Posted 6/7/2011 5:40 PM (GMT -6)   
Well yes, reachout, that is the big question. Why check the T level if you're not going to do anything about it? I think you should have a T test just to know where you stand. If it's normal than you know that's not the problem.  If it's low than you're like me, you have to  decide if the potential gain in quality of life is worth the risk of possible recurrence. On another thread swimmom said her husband has been on T for 6 years with no recurrence. So it's working for him. More and more studies are showing it's safe to use T if you have low risk gleason 6 cancers with no (apparent) spread. This is a very big individual decision for sure..........
My age= 52 when this all happened.
DRE=negative,
PSA went from 1.9 to 2.85 in one year, biopsy ordered,
Second biopsy on 08/14/08 found 2/12 cores positive for CA on R side, 1 core=5%CA, other core=25% CA, Gleason score= 6 both cores,
Bilateral nerve sparing robotic surgery on 09/11/08, pathological stage T2A,
No signs of spread, organ confined,
6 0's in a row, still use trimix for ED

North49
Regular Member


Date Joined Feb 2011
Total Posts : 83
   Posted 6/7/2011 7:50 PM (GMT -6)   
I have put off using Trimix since the suppository trimix gel left me with a nasty burning sensation. But after two different formulas of bimix, I have noticed a reduction in vaginal climax with the double strength, which is 26 mg/ml papaverine/2 mg/ml phentolamine versus the single strength 30 mg/ml papaverine/1 mg/ml phentolamine. So I wonder if the phentolamine is the culprit?

The reason I am trying the double strength is to reduce the amount injected, 0.8 ml single vs 0.5 double. Overall I'd say the double isn't double since it should be equivalent to 1.0 ml of the single. I'm not getting what I would call a better erection with the double and the increase in phentolamine seems to be dulling my climax.

My next visit I'll discuss straight papaverine, possibly 40mg/ml and see what the doc figures.
PSA 5.6 - 04/2010 - DRE positive
PSA 6.7 - 09/2010
Biopsy - 09/2010 - Age 53
T2b/c Gleason 7, 4+3
PSA 8.2 - 12/2010
RRP - 12/2010
pT3a, Gleason 7, 3+4, 20% PCa
pNO
Negative margins and seminal vesicles
RP 37.3 g
No further treatment recommended.
PSA <0.01 - 03/2011 - 3 month post-op
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
Forum Information
Currently it is Tuesday, September 25, 2018 6:19 PM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 3,006,644 posts in 329,385 threads.
View Active Threads


Who's Online
This forum has 161841 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, RICHGEN.
290 Guest(s), 8 Registered Member(s) are currently online.  Details
borrelioburgdorferii, 73monte, GreekGuy94, Killjoy123, Tredye, John T, ks1905, Tim Tam