Dude1969-I should change my name to jerry1965 for all us guys in our 40s (just assuming you're in your 40s)...I agree with your thinking... You would think a younger person would have a better response, but who knows.
"In this trial men under age 65 did not fair as well as the control arm."
Under 65? We are talking, in some cases, patients that are 20-30 years below 65. So how old were they in the study? 64, 60, 55, 50, 45, 40 ?????
Here's something to make everyone crazy as it relates to costs --- who's to say it wouldn't be even more beneficial given a second time down the road? Perhaps, that is one reason insurance companies are not quick to approve.
Post Edited (Jerry L.) : 3/1/2012 5:42:33 PM (GMT-7)