Ok, I have "good" news. I made a slightly gutsy move, and found the name of the radiologist that wrote the report. Then, I was able to get her direct email address (which wasn't easy), and I sent her a question directly.
My question:
----------------------------------------
Can you clarify this line: "Mild bulging of the capsule of the left base to mid gland. Otherwise, no evidence of extracapsular extension. No seminal vesicle invasion." I'm particularly unclear about the use of "Otherwise".
Am I correct to understand that you found bulging on the left base/mid region, which implies the presence of extracapsular extension in that area - but you found no bulging or extracapsular extension in any other area of the prostate?
Generally, are "bulging" and "extracapsular extension" synonymous in your report?----------------------------------------
Her answer:
----------------------------------------
Mild bulging of the capsule can just be related to mass effect by an underlying tumor or represent extracapsular extension. The bulging is smooth and not irregular, the latter of which would be more worrisome for extracapsular extension. Bulging in your case "raises the possibility of extracapsular extension", meaning there is some chance but not necessarily a high chance of extension. ----------------------------------------
I'm somewhat less shaken by the MRI report now. Exhale.
-Gedman
(PS.
Bluebird: I find your comments on my posts to be particularly helpful. Perhaps because I'm using the same docs that your husband used. Thanks so much!)
Latest update (as of 2/28):41y
Wife + 5 kids
PSA 9
Prostate size 21g
BX 1/17/13
Diagnosed 1/28/13
Positive 5 of 12 cores: G3+4 40%, G3+4 5%, G3+4 10%, G3+4 15%, G3+3 10%. One core PNI.
CT scan and Bone scan negative
MRI shows some bulging on left base/mid region
RALP with Dr. Ash Tewari scheduled for 4/3/13
Post Edited (gedman) : 3/13/2013 4:43:28 PM (GMT-6)