Open main menu ☰
HealingWell
Search Close Search
Health Conditions
Allergies Alzheimer's Disease Anxiety & Panic Disorders Arthritis Breast Cancer Chronic Illness Crohn's Disease Depression Diabetes
Fibromyalgia GERD & Acid Reflux Irritable Bowel Syndrome Lupus Lyme Disease Migraine Headache Multiple Sclerosis Prostate Cancer Ulcerative Colitis

View Conditions A to Z »
Support Forums
Anxiety & Panic Disorders Bipolar Disorder Breast Cancer Chronic Pain Crohn's Disease Depression Diabetes Fibromyalgia GERD & Acid Reflux
Hepatitis Irritable Bowel Syndrome Lupus Lyme Disease Multiple Sclerosis Ostomies Prostate Cancer Rheumatoid Arthritis Ulcerative Colitis

View Forums A to Z »
Log In
Join Us
Close main menu ×
  • Home
  • Health Conditions
    • All Conditions
    • Allergies
    • Alzheimer's Disease
    • Anxiety & Panic Disorders
    • Arthritis
    • Breast Cancer
    • Chronic Illness
    • Crohn's Disease
    • Depression
    • Diabetes
    • Fibromyalgia
    • GERD & Acid Reflux
    • Irritable Bowel Syndrome
    • Lupus
    • Lyme Disease
    • Migraine Headache
    • Multiple Sclerosis
    • Prostate Cancer
    • Ulcerative Colitis
  • Support Forums
    • All Forums
    • Anxiety & Panic Disorders
    • Bipolar Disorder
    • Breast Cancer
    • Chronic Pain
    • Crohn's Disease
    • Depression
    • Diabetes
    • Fibromyalgia
    • GERD & Acid Reflux
    • Hepatitis
    • Irritable Bowel Syndrome
    • Lupus
    • Lyme Disease
    • Multiple Sclerosis
    • Ostomies
    • Prostate Cancer
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Ulcerative Colitis
  • Log In
  • Join Us
Join Us
☰
Forum Home| Forum Rules| Moderators| Active Topics| Help| Log In

OT What I hate about statistics.

Support Forums
>
Prostate Cancer
✚ New Topic ✚ Reply
12
❬ ❬ Previous Thread |Next Thread ❭ ❭
profile picture
alephnull
Veteran Member
Joined : Dec 2013
Posts : 2011
Posted 4/6/2020 7:51 AM (GMT -7)
My Stats professor's first words to us were, statistics can say whatever you like, it's just how you frame them.
Politicians can use them to make you lean their way.

Stats:
Is your sample representative of the population? Darned important, and often not examined close enough.
What do your assumptions actually say. Too many don't look at the assumptions.
What do your assumptions leave out?
Are they trying to prove their preconceived conclusions or did they follow the data without an attachment to the outcome?
Just look at how wrong the Polls were in 2016. The experts were all so sure of the outcome.
Stats are also not meant to make decisions, they are meant to guide you in your decisions.
That's why proper models and how they are portrayed are so important.
Too many rely on stats as the end all, I'm not saying they aren't very useful, they absolutely are.
But too many don't understand them, thus leading to confusion and knee jerk reactions by the populace.
profile picture
JNF
Veteran Member
Joined : Dec 2010
Posts : 5113
Posted 4/6/2020 9:56 AM (GMT -7)
“Lies, darned lies and statistics.”

A quote often attributed to, and popularized by Mark Twain. But apparently coined by the British writer Sir Charles Dilke in 1891.

And of course “garbage in, garbage out”. And, yes, measuring “garbage” can be statistically valid and reliable.
profile picture
InTheShop
Elite Member
Joined : Jan 2012
Posts : 11468
Posted 4/6/2020 10:35 AM (GMT -7)
Figures don't lie, but liars can figure.
profile picture
halbert
Veteran Member
Joined : Dec 2014
Posts : 5101
Posted 4/6/2020 1:21 PM (GMT -7)
Aleph, all true. Your fourth question is the most challenging of all: most people don't even see their own biases when they are looking at data. I forget what it's called, something like the judicial paradox: That no judge is ever impartial, no matter how hard they try.

Same with statistics. Confirmation bias is one thing--and it's an easy trap to fall into, even easier in these days of massive data available to everyone. But the deeper search for data that supports one's belief--while ignoring data that does not--is the biggest joke of all among researchers. I've even seen it on posters in laboratories: All data that does not fit the hypothesis is to be discarded.
profile picture
alephnull
Veteran Member
Joined : Dec 2013
Posts : 2011
Posted 4/6/2020 3:29 PM (GMT -7)
All too true.

And that’s largely why I hate stats.

Mathematics not statistics is the pure science. Statistics is a tool that many abuse.
profile picture
halbert
Veteran Member
Joined : Dec 2014
Posts : 5101
Posted 4/6/2020 3:34 PM (GMT -7)
Aleph, I would argue that mathematics is not a science. It's a symbolic language that transcends all other languages.
profile picture
InTheShop
Elite Member
Joined : Jan 2012
Posts : 11468
Posted 4/6/2020 3:45 PM (GMT -7)
stats and calculus - two reason why I have a degree in English.
profile picture
VinceInMT
Regular Member
Joined : Mar 2018
Posts : 430
Posted 4/7/2020 6:42 AM (GMT -7)
When I was in grad school (education) we used this book in our stats class:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Lie_with_Statistics
profile picture
alephnull
Veteran Member
Joined : Dec 2013
Posts : 2011
Posted 4/7/2020 8:09 AM (GMT -7)
halbert,
I kind of agree, except all other true sciences can't exist without Mathematics. But I do see your point very clearly.

IntheShop, taking Stats almost made me change majors to something other than Mathematics. But something about logic, proofs and finding points in time and space, the area of super tiny rectangles, and volume of super tiny 3 dim objects was too appealing to pass up.

VinceinMT, yep, that's why I hate Stats.
profile picture
duke48
Regular Member
Joined : Apr 2015
Posts : 165
Posted 4/7/2020 8:31 AM (GMT -7)
Statistics never lie and all liars use statistics. The best thing I brought out of statistics class.
profile picture
mattam
Veteran Member
Joined : Aug 2015
Posts : 3040
Posted 4/7/2020 8:34 AM (GMT -7)
Statistics have never applied to me. One chance in 20 never turns out well.
profile picture
alephnull
Veteran Member
Joined : Dec 2013
Posts : 2011
Posted 4/7/2020 8:38 AM (GMT -7)
Except in weather, if they say (in KS) there's 50% chance of rain, that really means 100%. 40% is 50%, 30% is probably not, and 10% is not a chance in heck.

I agree that Stats don't lie. Only those with an agenda, IE politicians.
profile picture
garyi
Veteran Member
Joined : Jun 2017
Posts : 2086
Posted 4/7/2020 9:39 AM (GMT -7)

alephnull said...

.....I agree that Stats don't lie. Only those with an agenda, IE politicians.

And every human being ever born, especially those seeking unconditional truths.

For the record, we all have biases and agendas.....well except me ;-)
profile picture
mattam
Veteran Member
Joined : Aug 2015
Posts : 3040
Posted 4/7/2020 9:49 AM (GMT -7)
Yes, we all lie. If we were always absolutely honest, we would be at each other's throats. I guess if we didn't lie, we would always have to do social distancing. 🙂
profile picture
alephnull
Veteran Member
Joined : Dec 2013
Posts : 2011
Posted 4/7/2020 10:50 AM (GMT -7)
So, that's what Ted Kazinski was doing up in Montana. LOL!!
profile picture
GoBucks
Veteran Member
Joined : Jan 2018
Posts : 1022
Posted 4/8/2020 7:10 PM (GMT -7)
I love certain stats. Career .297 hitter. 399 HR. 3007 hits. 18 time All Star. RIP #6 Al Kaline.
profile picture
Tim G
Veteran Member
Joined : Jul 2006
Posts : 2945
Posted 4/8/2020 7:25 PM (GMT -7)

GoBucks said...
I love certain stats. Career .297 hitter. 399 HR. 3007 hits. 18 time All Star. RIP #6 Al Kaline.

Growing up in Detroit in the 50s, Al Kaline was my sports hero. He played his entire career for the Tigers.
profile picture
Mumbo
Veteran Member
Joined : Nov 2018
Posts : 1159
Posted 4/8/2020 7:40 PM (GMT -7)
Growing up in Chicago, Al Kaline was one of my favorite players also. Not sure why but he represented the game well, was a clutch player, and feared by everyone when he came to the plate.
profile picture
halbert
Veteran Member
Joined : Dec 2014
Posts : 5101
Posted 4/9/2020 5:49 AM (GMT -7)
In what other activity is a 30% success rate considered great--and 40% unheard of?

How about these baseball numbers (guess the player and year):

304 innings pitched. 1.12 ERA. 24W-10L, 268 SO, 62 BB, 11HR. Lost 1 game when the opposing pitcher threw a no-hitter. Extra points if you who THAT pitcher was.
profile picture
DjinTonic
Veteran Member
Joined : Dec 2019
Posts : 1229
Posted 4/9/2020 6:40 AM (GMT -7)

halbert said...
In what other activity is a 30% success rate considered great--and 40% unheard of?

How about these baseball numbers (guess the player and year):

304 innings pitched. 1.12 ERA. 24W-10L, 268 SO, 62 BB, 11HR. Lost 1 game when the opposing pitcher threw a no-hitter. Extra points if you who THAT pitcher was.

If a tie-breaker is needed after halbert's question:

Who played for the New York Rangers, the Brooklyn Dodgers, and the New York Knicks in a single season, and in what position?
profile picture
halbert
Veteran Member
Joined : Dec 2014
Posts : 5101
Posted 4/9/2020 6:44 AM (GMT -7)
Djin, I don't know the guy's name, but I know his position.
profile picture
alephnull
Veteran Member
Joined : Dec 2013
Posts : 2011
Posted 4/9/2020 6:46 AM (GMT -7)
Baseball, well sports the only place where stats warm my heart.
Living in KS, my all time favorite was George Brett.
The summer of 1980 was so memorable for more than the heat wave. Here's an excerpt from Wikipedia.

"All these impressive statistics were just a prelude to 1980, when Brett won the American League MVP and batted .390, a modern record for a third baseman. Brett's batting average was at or above .400 as late in the season as September 19, and the country closely followed his quest to bat .400 for an entire season, a feat which has not been accomplished since Ted Williams in 1941.

Brett's 1980 batting average of .390 is second only to Tony Gwynn's 1994 average of .394 (Gwynn played in 110 games and had 419 at-bats in the strike-shortened season, compared to Brett's 449 at bats in 1980) for the highest single season batting average since 1941. Brett also recorded 118 runs batted in, while appearing in just 117 games; it was the first instance of a player averaging one RBI per game (in more than 100 games) since Walt Dropo thirty seasons prior. He led the American League in both slugging and on-base percentage.

Brett started out slowly, hitting only .259 in April. In May, he hit .329 to get his season average to .301. In June, the 27-year-old third baseman hit .472 (17–36) to raise his season average to .337, but played his last game for a month on June 10, not returning to the lineup until after the All-Star Break on July 10.

In July, after being off for a month, he played in 21 games and hit .494 (42–85), raising his season average to .390. Brett started a 30-game hitting streak on July 18, which lasted until he went 0–3 on August 19 (the following night he went 3-for-3). During those 30 games, Brett hit .467 (57–122). His high mark for the season came a week later, when Brett's batting average was at .407 on August 26, after he went 5-for-5 on a Tuesday night in Milwaukee. He batted .430 for the month of August (30 games), and his season average was at .403 with five weeks to go. For the three hot months of June, July, and August 1980, George Brett played in 60 American League games and hit .459 (111–242), most of it after a return from a month long injury. For these 60 games he had 69 RBIs and 14 home runs.

Brett missed another 10 days in early September and hit just .290 for the month. His average was at .400 as late as September 19, but he then had a 4 for 27 slump, and the average dipped to .384 on September 27, with a week to play. For the final week, Brett went 10-for-19, which included going 2 for 4 in the final regular season game on October 4. His season average ended up at .390 (175 hits in 449 at-bats = .389755), and he averaged more than one RBI per game. Brett led the league in both on-base percentage (.454) and slugging percentage (.664) on his way to capturing 17 of 28 possible first-place votes in the MVP race. Since Al Simmons also batted .390 in 1931 for the Philadelphia Athletics, the only higher averages subsequent to 1931 were by Ted Williams of the Red Sox (.406 in 1941) and Tony Gwynn of the San Diego Padres (.394 in the strike-shortened 1994 season). "
profile picture
VinceInMT
Regular Member
Joined : Mar 2018
Posts : 430
Posted 4/9/2020 6:59 AM (GMT -7)

alephnull said...
So, that's what Ted Kazinski was doing up in Montana. LOL!!

He was the original social distancer.
profile picture
mattam
Veteran Member
Joined : Aug 2015
Posts : 3040
Posted 4/9/2020 7:17 AM (GMT -7)
He still is. Super Max in Colorado I believe.
profile picture
alephnull
Veteran Member
Joined : Dec 2013
Posts : 2011
Posted 4/9/2020 8:14 AM (GMT -7)
Yep, that's where he's at.
BTK is in one of Kansas's prisons along with the Carr brothers.
✚ New Topic ✚ Reply
12

More On Prostate Cancer

An Unexpected Diagnosis Of Prostate Cancer

An Unexpected Diagnosis Of Prostate Cancer

7 Ways To Stay In Control And Reduce Stress While Battling Cancer

7 Ways To Stay In Control And Reduce Stress While Battling Cancer



HealingWell

About Us  |   Advertise  |   Subscribe  |   Privacy & Disclaimer
Connect With Us
FacebookFacebook TwitterTwitter InstagramInstagram PinterestPinterest LinkedInLinkedIn
© 1997-2021 HealingWell.com LLC All Rights Reserved. Our website is for informational purposes only. HealingWell.com LLC does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.