Here's what I would see on the Forum before:
"Mattam, glad to see you're able to get on. Don't know if Ken's intervention helped or it's just serendipity but here you are. Supposedly there will be better infrastructure and some new features. We really don't know. The new ownership has gone dark on us so we're just doing business as usual. Which, as you say, is fine with us also. I know we all saw some instability in the forum platform during the past couple of weeks. If I had to guess, I would say that the IT folks tried to do the "transition", ran into problems then reverted to what we had. I guess we'll see.
Here's what I now see:
"Mɒttɒm, ϱlɒb to ƨɘɘ γoυ'ɿɘ ɒdlɘ to ϱɘt on. Ⴇon't ʞnow iʇ ﻼɘn'ƨ intɘɿvɘntion ʜɘlqɘb oɿ it'ƨ įυƨt ƨɘɿɘnbiqitγ dυt ʜɘɿɘ γoυ ɒɿɘ. Ƨυqqoƨɘblγ tʜɘɿɘ will dɘ dɘttɘɿ inʇɿɒƨtɿυɔtυɿɘ ɒnb ƨomɘ nɘw ʇɘɒtυɿɘƨ. Wɘ ɿɘɒllγ bon't ʞnow. Tʜɘ nɘw ownɘɿƨʜiq ʜɒƨ ϱonɘ bɒɿʞ on υƨ ƨo wɘ'ɿɘ įυƨt boinϱ dυƨinɘƨƨ ɒƨ υƨυɒl. Wʜiɔʜ, ɒƨ γoυ ƨɒγ, iƨ ʇinɘ witʜ υƨ ɒlƨo. I ʞnow wɘ ɒll ƨɒw ƨomɘ inƨtɒdilitγ in tʜɘ ʇoɿυm qlɒtʇoɿm bυɿinϱ tʜɘ qɒƨt ɔoυqlɘ oʇ wɘɘʞƨ. Iʇ I ʜɒb to ϱυɘƨƨ, I woυlb ƨɒγ tʜɒt tʜɘ IT ʇolʞƨ tɿiɘb to bo tʜɘ "tɿɒnƨition", ɿɒn into qɿodlɘmƨ tʜɘn ɿɘvɘɿtɘb to wʜɒt wɘ ʜɒb. I ϱυɘƨƨ wɘ'll ƨɘɘ.
Does that look right to you !?!?
Post Edited (DjinTonic) : 9/30/2023 7:22:33 AM (GMT-8)