Concerned and baffled

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> ]

Brian3296
New Member


Date Joined Sep 2006
Total Posts : 1
   Posted 9/8/2006 8:06 PM (GMT -7)   
 
My father was diagnosed with Prostate cancer last week. 72 years old and in otherwise very good health. Gleason scale 9 - not good. Heres what baffles me. He has had urinating symptoms for ten years and has been consistently under the care of a urologist. Prostate has been needle biopsied 4 times since 1995 - all negative. As the difficulty urinating became a problem, he underwent surgery last February to remove a portion of the prostate, it was biopsied - again negative. After the surgery he consistently had blood in his urine, the doctor re-scheduled him for surgery which he had two weeks ago. This time the biopsy came back positive with the 9 rating. He has started hormone therapy and is scheduled for a bone scan.
 
The thing I dont understand is my Dad could be the poster boy for preventative medicine. Can prostate cancer of this severity come out of nowhere like this? the doctor said this is unfortunate but fairly common - I have my doubts.
 
Any info on similar stories would be helpful; I'm just starting to deal with this
 
Thanks  Brian
  
 

Post Edited (Brian3296) : 9/9/2006 12:04:04 PM (GMT-6)


spinbiscuit
Veteran Member


Date Joined Apr 2006
Total Posts : 818
   Posted 9/8/2006 9:59 PM (GMT -7)   
Hello Brian,

I can't imagine how a Gleason score of 9 could go undetected for so long. Were the other tests also negative DRE and PSA? It seem one of these would have hinted a cause for concern before now. It is very dubious that your dad's PCa appeared out of thin air virtually overnight.

I hope that your dad's hormone theopy is successful, please keep us posted on his progress.

Glen

aus
Regular Member


Date Joined Sep 2006
Total Posts : 211
   Posted 9/9/2006 9:44 PM (GMT -7)   

Brian,

Without a lot of  the specific detail, here are a few general comments:

Enlarged prostate symptoms, volume of cancer, and agressiveness of the cancer / gleason score, are not necessarily related.

Look at the recent posting here, "Small volume cancer PSA 20  G 8"

Someone can have a PV which is small in size,  but it can still be an agressive cancer. 

Determining the gleason score is a subjective process: a 2nd opinion can result in a different rating.

 

 

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
Forum Information
Currently it is Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:20 AM (GMT -7)
There are a total of 2,904,304 posts in 318,743 threads.
View Active Threads


Who's Online
This forum has 158131 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, suzen.
218 Guest(s), 1 Registered Member(s) are currently online.  Details
physedgirl09