Looking for experienced *opinions* on echocardiograms

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> ]

New Member

Date Joined Jun 2011
Total Posts : 2
   Posted 6/9/2011 2:12 PM (GMT -6)   
My son recently went in for his five year old check-up and a murmur was detected for the first time.  He was referred to Children's Hospital to get checked out by a cardiologist.  The EKG was fine, but the echocardiogram detected a bicuspid aortic valve.  I was told there was no stenosis or leakage and that they didn't need to see him for another two years.  I was puzzled as to why a murmur without any leakage or stenosis?  Since that day, I've read quite a bit on the condition and the reliability of the echos in children.  I have no reason to doubt the doctor's diagnosis and I fully plan on following through with serial cardiac visits, but I want to know as much information as possible. 
Is it *possible* that my son's diagnosis was a false positive?  Does that ever happen?  If so, how often?  I've read that echo results can be wildly inconsistent based on several factors like technician skill/patience, placement of electrodes, child's age, echo artifacts etc.  Is this a possibility?
I assume anyone reading this has probably had a good amount of experience with echocardiograms.  Heck, I had one a year ago due to persistent PVC's and was told I was fine.  Could I possibly have a BAV that was missed??
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
Forum Information
Currently it is Wednesday, July 18, 2018 2:02 AM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 2,982,656 posts in 327,034 threads.
View Active Threads

Who's Online
This forum has 161849 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, Neil Ryan.
293 Guest(s), 1 Registered Member(s) are currently online.  Details