Looking for experienced *opinions* on echocardiograms

New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> ]

New Member

Date Joined Jun 2011
Total Posts : 2
   Posted 6/9/2011 2:12 PM (GMT -6)   
My son recently went in for his five year old check-up and a murmur was detected for the first time.  He was referred to Children's Hospital to get checked out by a cardiologist.  The EKG was fine, but the echocardiogram detected a bicuspid aortic valve.  I was told there was no stenosis or leakage and that they didn't need to see him for another two years.  I was puzzled as to why a murmur without any leakage or stenosis?  Since that day, I've read quite a bit on the condition and the reliability of the echos in children.  I have no reason to doubt the doctor's diagnosis and I fully plan on following through with serial cardiac visits, but I want to know as much information as possible. 
Is it *possible* that my son's diagnosis was a false positive?  Does that ever happen?  If so, how often?  I've read that echo results can be wildly inconsistent based on several factors like technician skill/patience, placement of electrodes, child's age, echo artifacts etc.  Is this a possibility?
I assume anyone reading this has probably had a good amount of experience with echocardiograms.  Heck, I had one a year ago due to persistent PVC's and was told I was fine.  Could I possibly have a BAV that was missed??
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
Forum Information
Currently it is Thursday, September 20, 2018 9:40 AM (GMT -6)
There are a total of 3,005,056 posts in 329,192 threads.
View Active Threads

Who's Online
This forum has 161760 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, Adrianna1023.
271 Guest(s), 13 Registered Member(s) are currently online.  Details
SoMuchFun, logoslidat, mattamx, JNF, Bohemond, leelee112233, Anitas, C_G_K, 61Impala, SharonZ, cppoly, halbert, (Seashell)