New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> ]

BillCue
New Member


Date Joined Jul 2013
Total Posts : 1
   Posted 7/2/2013 12:16 PM (GMT -7)   
Why is 5 cm a magic measurement that fits a 90 pound woman and a 260 pound fullback, when their heart sizes vary considerably? I would think a percent of dilation would give a better idea of risk for a particular situation. I do understand that rate of change is considered. It is the "drop dead" line in the sand of 5cm that has me wondering.

stkitt
Forum Moderator


Date Joined Apr 2007
Total Posts : 32602
   Posted 7/14/2013 10:55 AM (GMT -7)   
Bill,
 
Hello and welcome to HealingWell.  PFO size or morphology should not be the only criteria to decide if an intervention is required.
 
There is much on the internet  as studies are in progress.  You could ask your cardiologist for info re recent studies and outcomes.
 
 
~~Kitt~~
Moderator: Anxiety, Osteoarthritis,
GERD/Heartburn and Heart/Cardiovascular Disease.



"“Walk on with hope in your heart,
and you'll never walk alone."
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
Forum Information
Currently it is Thursday, February 22, 2018 6:09 PM (GMT -7)
There are a total of 2,932,222 posts in 321,717 threads.
View Active Threads


Who's Online
This forum has 160420 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, sebatasa.
462 Guest(s), 16 Registered Member(s) are currently online.  Details
Hopeful86, mattamx, netsavy006, jowens521, astroman, Hoagie, cakegirl, zrobinso, Ljm2014, Progressing, Saipan Paradise, Fairwind, Mbajda, Tim Tam, straydog, Jack & Diane